|
UK Paper Industry Urges Government to Change Policies
|
"Government policy is acting as a huge disincentive to further
investment and could result in the closure of many mills over the next
decade. –David Workman, Director General, CPI.
|
Sept. 20, 2012 - In a press statement, the Confederation of Paper Industries' (CPI) Director General David Workman urged the UK government to reconsider upcoming policies that could have devastating effects on the UK's paper industry.
"The UK’s Paper Industry still operates 50 mills and accounts for 25,000
jobs. It contributes significantly to the UK economy. It has reduced
energy consumption and carbon emissions by over 30% since 1990. It has
invested £10bns in state of the art equipment and Combined Heat and
Power (CHP) and on-site biomass plants. Paper is now the most recycled of
materials with a recycling rate of 73%.
"However, government policy is acting as a huge disincentive to further
investment and could result in the closure of many mills over the next
decade.
Potentially the most damaging of the policies is the Carbon Price Floor
which comes into effect in 2013. At £16 per tonne it could cost UK
Energy Intensive Industries more than twice the amount paid by our EU
competitors. The rate is due to increase by £2 per tonnes every year, until
2020. Our competitors outside of the EU will not be paying anything at all!!!! The government should
abandon plans to implement this tax.
"New Climate Change Agreements (CCAs) come into force next year. DECC has arbitrarily set the Paper
Industry a target of a further 14% reduction in energy use and added hugely to the costs of running the
scheme by making targets site-specific, rather than sector-specific. Ministers need to intervene to ensure
that targets are achievable. CCAs also need to remain sector-specific as this is the only way that individual
company investment cycles can be taken into account.
"Incentives for investing in and operating industrial CHP plants need to be restored.
UK Industry needs an energy policy based on affordability and not on meeting renewable targets. This
would be a huge u-turn but is the only way of countering the competitive effects of lower energy costs
around the world due to the exploitation of shale gas. US industrial gas prices are now about a quarter of
those paid in the UK.
"Subsidies for Energy from Waste and large scale energy only biomass should be phased out as they put
at risk supplies of the Paper Industry’s basic raw materials — recycled fibres and wood pulp..
Raw material scarcity is potentially a huge issue over the coming years and we need a waste strategy
based on resource efficiency and a “circular economy” where the priority is closed loop recycling. This
means central command and control and a further u-turn on the “localism agenda.”
"CPI would also urge UK government to lobby the EU to prevent additional costs being imposed on
industry through measures to tighten limits under the Industrial Emissions Directive and the EU’s
Emissions Trading Scheme. The proposed Sulphur Directive should be implemented in a time scale that
does not penalise shipping in Northern European waters.
"The measures outlined above are essential if the UK’s Paper Industry is to thrive in these difficult
economic times. CPI hopes that the new Ministerial teams have the courage to make the necessary
changes to government policy that will make the UK a place where the world’s Paper Industry will want
to invest."
CPI will be present at the Tory Party conference for two days on the 8 and 9 October, and David Workman, CPI
Director General, will be speaking at the Dods UK Manufacturing Dialogue fringe meeting organised by Dods
on 8 October.
CPI is the voice and face of the UK's Paper and Paper-Based Industries, representing the supply chain for paper, comprising recovered paper merchants, paper and board manufacturers and converters, corrugated packaging producers and makers of soft tissue papers. CPI represents 70 Member Companies, with a combined annual turnover of £5 billion and 25,000 direct and more than 100,000 indirect employees.
SOURCE: CPI (www.paper.org.uk).
|